OLIVIER GIROUD sunk Spurs and made Frank Lampard look a bit foolish.The France frontman has been snubbed by his Chelsea boss for most of the season.2 Olivier Giroud opened the scoring for Chelsea.Credit: EPAEven when other Blues strikers were injured or misfiring, Giroud still could not get a look in.Well, it appears Lampard got it very badly wrong.The gaffer will be relieved a man after seeing his side claim their first Premier League win in five matches.He should also feel a bit sheepish as the victory was thanks largely to the man he has overlooked for so long.Indeed had Chelsea managed to sign a striker in January then Giroud would not even still be at the club.The Les Bleus ace had offers on the table from Inter Milan, Lazio and, ironically, Tottenham and Chelsea said he could leave if they brought in a replacement, which they did not.So Giroud was made to stay.To his credit he never once sulked or spoke out against his employer, despite his obvious frustration.And when he was handed just his fourth start of the season against Spurs he showed he is a class act on the field too.CHELSEA NEWS LIVE: Follow for all the latest on the BluesHe fired Chelsea ahead in the 15th minute with a stunning driven finish, which beat his France skipper Hugo Lloris at his near post by virtue of its power and precision.His tenacity in beating Toby Alderweireld to get his head to Cesar Azpilicueta’s thrown then led to Marcos Alonso scoring the hosts’ crucial second.And while most of the talk will be about Lampard getting one over his master Jose Mourinho, it was Giroud who actually made it happen.The signs were there when the forward came off the bench against Manchester United and scored a fantastic header which was ruled out by VAR.Not even technology could deny Giroud against Tottenham as replays showed he timed his run to perfection in the build up to his goal – his first in the Premier League for 325 days.2 Frank Lampard’s side are now four points clear of TottenhamCredit: AP:Associated PressMOST READ IN FOOTBALLTHROUGH ITRobbie Keane reveals Claudine’s father was ’50-50′ in coronavirus battleTOP SELLERGavin Whelan has gone from League of Ireland to David Beckham’s InstagramPicturedAN EYEFULMeet Playboy model and football agent Anamaria Prodan bidding to buy her own clubI SAW ROORodallega saw Rooney ‘drinking like madman’ & Gerrard ‘on bar dancing shirtless’ExclusiveRIYAD RAIDMan City’s Riyad Mahrez has three luxury watches stolen in £500,000 raidNEXT STEPJonny Hayes set to move to English Championship having been let go by CelticREF RELEASEDChampions League ref Vincic released by cops after arrest in prostitution raidKEANE DEALEx Man United youth ace David Jones says Roy Keane negotiated a contract for himREF RAIDChampions League ref Vincic ‘arrested in raid into drugs and prostitution ring’NICE RONCristiano Ronaldo goes on family bike ride with partner Georgina Rodriguez & kidsHe rightly received a standing ovation when he was replaced by Tammy Abraham in the 71st minute.If there is any justice Giroud will keep his place in Lampard’s line-up for Tuesday’s Champions League last 16 first leg tie at home to Bayern Munich.Although on this evidence you have to wonder why he was left out of the Chelsea team in the first place.
Jun 14 2018A large proportion of the American public opts to receive cancer screenings with the hope that testing will reduce their chance of cancer death. Now, a team led by University of Missouri psychological science researchers has determined that patients may want cancer screenings even if the potential harms outweigh the benefits. Researchers believe that clinicians and oncologists could develop better communications tools and provide reassurance to their patients in better ways.”First, I would stress that that there is inherent value in cancer screenings–especially for those who are at higher risk, or for whom cancer may have a familial or genetic component,” said Laura Scherer, assistant professor of psychological sciences in the College of Arts and Science at MU. “However, in our studies we wanted to see whether the public would be as enthusiastic about cancer screenings even if the harms unambiguously outweighed the benefits.”As guidelines for breast and prostate cancer screenings continue to change, clinicians and researchers have found that these tests have uncertain benefit in some populations. For example, screenings may produce false positives that could lead to unnecessary worry and follow up tests. Cancer screening can also result in overdiagnosis, which could result in costly and unnecessary treatment of cancers that will never spread or cause symptoms.The research team devised two online studies, one of which involved a nationally representative U.S. sample. All participants were asked whether they would want to receive a hypothetical cancer screening for breast (women) or prostate (men) cancer that did not reduce the chance of cancer death or extend life.Related StoriesTrends in colonoscopy rates not aligned with increase in early onset colorectal cancerUsing machine learning algorithm to accurately diagnose breast cancerHow cell-free DNA can be targeted to prevent spread of tumorsMore than half of the participants wanted to receive the described screening test. Additionally, more than one-third of respondents wanted screening when the possibility of serious harm from screening was described in detail, in addition to communicating a lack of benefit.”Previous research has demonstrated strong public interest in cancer screenings and our study adds to that discussion,” Scherer said. “According to responses, many people did not believe, even hypothetically, that screening might not save lives. Furthermore, some people in our studies believed that screening provided important health information, and they wanted that information even if it did not save lives. The data also suggested that many people wanted health information because they were seeking to address their anxiety and obtain reassurance. Our findings show that people have a strong desire to do something to address the threat of cancer and that they would prefer to receive a screening test that does not save lives rather than not be screened at all.”Scherer suggests that it may be beneficial to explicitly address patients’ anxiety and their desire for reassurance and health information, both in conversations between clinicians and patients, as well as in informational tools that seek to inform patients about the risks and benefits of cancer screening. Printed pamphlets and other tools could better relate the risks and benefits of health screenings to those seeking the tests.Source: https://munews.missouri.edu/news-releases/2018/0613-patients-prefer-to-have-cancer-screenings-despite-risks-and-warnings-mu-researchers-find/